21/12/2019

UFC Rematch Betting Strategy & Statistics


Rematches are not rare in the world of mixed martial arts. When a fighter sticks round the organization for a length of time, then you can rest assured theyll be scheduled to fight. In addition to this, most dominant winners will constantly have two or a rematch solely due to running out of opponents that are new to confront in their weight class.
When these rematches take place should they be wager by you? In case you bet upon the fighter who won the first battle? Is the underdog the right play? Thats a question I wanted to answer so that I brought up some data on the topic.
From the rematch, when boxers have faced each other the winner of the struggle has gone 71-43-3 since UFC 1. This usually means the winner is victorious in 62??percent??of rematch??struggles.
If you are looking to wager on MMA or the UFC, check out our list of the Very Best Sites To Do That.
So as to use these amounts to our full benefit as bettors, we will need to dive into them a bit deeper. Our database for fight odds goes back to 2012, therefore well use from then until present day (August 9,??2019) as our sample size to get favorites and underdogs.
Fighters who won the very first fight walked??to the rematch because of betting favorite??36??times out of a total of 60??rematches because 2012, winning 28??of those battles (77.7??percent??win rate).
The profit from such types of fights is not as big as you might imagine given the simple fact that a decent part of the fighters wouldve been favorites with a significant margin while that is an success rate. $100 bettors would have walked away with a gain of $377.64??should they blindly bet about the fighter that won the preceding bout when they had been listed as the favorite??in the next battle all 36??times this occurred.
The most important (and profitable) statistic I discovered was that the fighter that won the initial bout??won 14??from 24??rematches when they had been recorded as a underdog, providing $100 bettors a gain of $1,013.46.
Overall, because 2012,??should you bet $100 in the fighter who won the very first fight when they competed at a rematch, then you would have gained a gain of 1,391.10.
History will repeat itself, and UFC rematches are no exception to this rule.
Even though winning their battle as Daniel Cormier went into his rematch bettors are able to look at UFC 210. He won in lopsided fashion through second-round submission. Rose Namajunas was also an money heading with Joanna Jedrzejczyk into her UFC 223 rematch and proceeded to triumph in a convincing unanimous decision.
While the statistics reveal that betting if they rematch a competition on the fighter that won the fight is rewarding, the opposite can obviously be stated about gambling on fighters in a rematch bout who lost the first contest.
Favorites in rematches when they dropped the first battle are 10-14, losing $100 bettors that a total of 926.21.
Underdogs in rematches if they dropped the first battle are 8-28 bettors that a total of $979.
To put these betting statistics into terms you can feel secure gambling onto a fighter when they choose someone whom theyve already conquered. Whether theyre recorded as favorites or maybe not, you will gradually acquire a profit long term executing this approach.
Not all rematches are created equal. There are a number of conflicts that never ought to be scrapped with a second time, or possibly a third time in some cases * ahem * BJ Penn vs Frankie Edgar * ahem *.
To take these conflicts for interests sake??I wanted to consider the numbers when choosing name conflicts that were ONLY into account. For the struggle to fall under this class the rematch and the very first battle had??to have been to get the buckle.
The record for the winner is 25-10.
Since 2012, past winners in fights for the title are 17-3, netting $100 bettors a profit of $725.20.
These numbers do nothing but further the purpose that betting on the winner is a intelligent play, so feel free to employ this strategy going forward in the event that you want to win a little cash.

Read more here: http://macrovax.com com 1,391.10.
History will repeat itself, and UFC rematches are no exception to this rule.
Even though winning their battle as Daniel Cormier went into his rematch bettors are able to look at UFC 210. He won in lopsided fashion through second-round submission. Rose Namajunas was also an money heading with Joanna Jedrzejczyk into her UFC 223 rematch and proceeded to triumph in a convincing unanimous decision.
While the statistics reveal that betting if they rematch a competition on the fighter that won the fight is rewarding, the opposite can obviously be stated about gambling on fighters in a rematch bout who lost the first contest.
Favorites in rematches when they dropped the first battle are 10-14, losing $100 bettors that a total of 926.21.
Underdogs in rematches if they dropped the first battle are 8-28 bettors that a total of $979.
To put these betting statistics into terms you can feel secure gambling onto a fighter when they choose someone whom theyve already conquered. Whether theyre recorded as favorites or maybe not, you will gradually acquire a profit long term executing this approach.
Not all rematches are created equal. There are a number of conflicts that never ought to be scrapped with a second time, or possibly a third time in some cases * ahem * BJ Penn vs Frankie Edgar * ahem *.
To take these conflicts for interests sake??I wanted to consider the numbers when choosing name conflicts that were ONLY into account. For the struggle to fall under this class the rematch and the very first battle had??to have been to get the buckle.
The record for the winner is 25-10.
Since 2012, past winners in fights for the title are 17-3, netting $100 bettors a profit of $725.20.
These numbers do nothing but further the purpose that betting on the winner is a intelligent play, so feel free to employ this strategy going forward in the event that you want to win a little cash.

Read more here: http://macrovax.com